Skip to main content

Addiction: Sportscenter

Many famous philosophers have hypothesized that, as advertised, ESPN is truly The Worldwide Leader in Sports. And who am I, or anyone with no knowledge of the world of sports broadcasting, to say otherwise. From Monday Night Football, to prime-time games, to a newly-acquired Wimbledon contract, ESPN has certainly created a near monopoly on sports broadcasting. The two cable channels, as well as the online ESPN3.com, and the oft forgotten ESPNU (channel 788 for all you Comcast aficionados), are often the subject of my mid-afternoon gaze. It seems that ESPN has created what I have always wanted, a guaranteed source of sports commentary amidst the regular drudgery of flipping through cable television. Yet it is this easy dependence that is a blessing and a curse of the TV world.




In the first of many in a series of posts with the title Addiction, I will examine the television version of heroin, otherwise known as Sportscenter.

To many, Sportscenter is either an unknown term, or a lightly familiar television show on ESPN. But to people like me, people who follow the world of sports, ESPN is like, well, heroin. I know that my case of addiction may be a little severe, but I am not ashamed to admit that on many occasions, I have viewed the same edition of Sportscenter more than once. And not for lack of knowledge that it was the same episode, but due to my yearning for just a little more, if even the slightest bit more information on the world of sports on that day.

Now, for those of you who are unaware of how Sportscenter works, allow me to explain. Throughout the day, professional sporting events happen throughout the world. And Sportscenter, the genius, captivating drug that it is, mushes all of that sports goodness into an hour of action packed, high flying coverage. The dialogue is occasionally littered with joking tones and friendly conversations, but for the most part, it is an all-sports version of the news. And although excerpts of the show continue throughout the day, new information is continuously added until, during the prime time of the night, the 100th (or so it may seem) episode of the day airs, full of everything from the day.

Anyway, now that everyone is up to speed, allow me to explain how this seemingly great outlet of sports information really can be characterized by the negative side effects of hard core drugs as well. Despite keeping you from your family and friends for days on end, much like many drugs, Sportscenter slowly becomes a part of you, and all of the batting averages and ERA's are planted in your head until you become a walking sports encyclopedia. Even I often am puzzled at how much relatively useless information I retain while watching the show, until I realize I've heard them talk about Albert Pujols' broken arm 18 times. It has basically gotten to the point where I could listen to Sportscenter analysts talk about trades and drafts and matchups for days on end. And it is this depressing fact that leads me to the "dealbreaker" of this whole situation: I can't figure out why I trust these analysts in the first place.

I have said many times that I do not believe being a professional athlete gives you the right to decide something like who a team should draft, or how owners should proceed during a lockout. Outside of the likes of Lee Corso and Lou Holtz, the analysts hold no comedic ability, and barely are capable of completing a sentence. Sportscenter will often show the "Sports Résumé" of an athlete, only for me to discover that the played NFL quarterback on 6 teams in 7 years, and have completed 15 career touchdowns. Yeah, now I trust that you think an NFL team is in dire need of a new free safety in the upcoming draft. And yet, although I find that I frequently disagree with the analysts, I am captivated by their opinion.

However, will all of my wonderful critiques of Sportscenter convince me to stop watching? Of course not. Where the hell else can I watch hours upon hours of highlights from all of the sports activities of the day?

And for all of you who do watch Sportscenter for your highlight needs, I encourage you to come here for everything else... Because with two lockouts this summer, anyone who isn't a baseball freak, may need a little more stimulation.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Brett Favre's Illustrious Career and 'The Viking Situation'

Seeing as this is my first post, I would like to ask for a pass in advance for any typos, or errors in my facts in any of my posts. As his career comes to an end, (hopefully) I would like to take this time to examine Brett Favre 's career and my self-entitled 'Viking Situation' , and relate it to Any Given Sunday , which seemingly hasn't been done (other than this and this , both of which fail to fully relate 'The Viking Situation'), which I believe is odd. As well, as a disclaimer, I realize that the movie does not model the current situation, given the time difference, and merely wish to offer an odd amount of similarities. Brett Favre Dennis Quaid First, and most prevalently, credit must be given where credit is due. Brett Favre is arguably one of the best quarterbacks of all time, and seemingly the toughest. His record for yards (71,838) and touchdowns (508) are hard to argue with, although he also holds the records for most times sacked and most...
Post a Comment
Read more

Don't Worry, Nothing's Changed

So, despite the lockout and many other off-season ordeals, the largest change in the NFL seems to be that crazy kick return rule. The average dim-witted NFL analysts was shocked to learn that despite the ball being placed 5 yards up from last years 35-yard line, there were 8 kick return touchdowns in week 1. Of course, in any week, 8 kick return touchdowns is significant, but those extra five yards, I chose to argue, make no difference. So let's start by looking at a couple of examples: So I know these are both Percy Harvin , who is an amazing kick returner, but let's look at one other similarity between these two plays: Harvin beats the last defender with his incredible speed with about 30 yards to go before the end zone. Thus, would it have really mattered if the ball was 10, 20, even 30 yards closer to the offense. I say no. I for one, understand the idea of a shorter kickoff. The many blindside hits and concussions caused by kickoffs are dangerous to the sport, and ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Equilibrium

A couple of weeks ago, I was watching an NFL pregame show, and in between the usual banter about RG III, Tim Tebow, and the Eagles (just three things in the NFL people need to shut up about), there was a comment that caught my attention. One of the announcers noted that the AFC had only two teams with a record above .500, the Ravens and Texans, who coincidentally would play later that day. So at first glance, as he noted, it appears the 'balance of power' has shifted to the NFC, in part due to NFC teams playing in larger markets (which is also a ridiculous statement).  Anyway, I'd like to fast forward two weeks and shit on this dude. As the standings sit today, both conferences have 7 teams with records above .500. So, clearly, fuck him. However, this announcer has two good excuses at this point. First, he made his comments during week 7, meaning most teams had played a total of 6 games, which despite being enough of a sample to judge the balance of power in the leag...
Post a Comment
Read more