Skip to main content

Sympathy

 I am a faithful fan of the California Golden Bears. I watch Bears football through thick (and it has been very thick as of late), and thin. But when they lose, and subsequently lose bowl game hopes, it begins to become tough to care about any college football. Whereas an Alabama Crimson Tide fan can constantly be involved in their teams season and games, I am forced to continuously hope that Stanford will lose, simply out of spite.

And as I have watched my fanhood wither this season, so has my interest in college football games other than #1 v. #2 matchups... Until last night. At around 3:30 (on the west coast), I texted an acquaintance of mine: "Wisconsin Michigan St? ur house?" At this point I will concede that this was a high-profile game, and being a sports fan, it does make sense that I would be interested in this game, but it was my subconscious Badger disposition that struck me as odd as the game unfolded. I found myself hoping that Russell Wilson would make a big play, or that Montee Ball would scamper for a touchdown. But why? I am not from Wisconsin, I did not attend Wisconsin, and I certainly don't care about the Big 10 standings.

The answer to this question, I began to realize, is the propaganda juggernaut otherwise known as ESPN. Earlier in the day, I had watched an hour long special called Depth Chart, which focused on the situation at quarterback for the Badgers, from spring football to opening day. It was a great story; the injured 1st string quarterback gets replaced by a three-year starter from another school. It discussed Wilson's thorough knowledge of the offensive playbook, and highlighted his ability to execute it to perfection in a game situation. But besides all of the talk about Wilson's success at quarterback, it was the persuasive quality of the show that got me. The video games in player's apartments and pizza parties with the captains, made the Badgers seem like just average people. In addition, the interviews about the perspective season, and the occasional analysis of a player's personality added to the persuasive nature of the show.

And on Saturday night, when the Badgers entered Spartan Stadium, I was rooting for Wilson and his Badgers; I had been conditioned to root for them. Thus, it seems ESPN is almost creating fans. At least in my particular case, ESPN was able to take a fan with relatively no allegiances, and persuade them to switch sides. Yet it wasn't as if I was rooting for a team, I was rooting for the players; I wanted them to succeed. And when they lost on the last play of the game, I was truly frustrated, simply out of sympathy.

I just want ESPN to stop messing with my emotions. Their ability to subliminally produce allegiance in the heads of unsuspecting fans is deadly. I want to watch Saturday Night football with no preconceived notions about the teams; unless, of course, my Bears are on the field.

Also, here's that last play. Even though I can't watch it without feeling bad for Mr. Wilson:


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brett Favre's Illustrious Career and 'The Viking Situation'

Seeing as this is my first post, I would like to ask for a pass in advance for any typos, or errors in my facts in any of my posts. As his career comes to an end, (hopefully) I would like to take this time to examine Brett Favre 's career and my self-entitled 'Viking Situation' , and relate it to Any Given Sunday , which seemingly hasn't been done (other than this and this , both of which fail to fully relate 'The Viking Situation'), which I believe is odd. As well, as a disclaimer, I realize that the movie does not model the current situation, given the time difference, and merely wish to offer an odd amount of similarities. Brett Favre Dennis Quaid First, and most prevalently, credit must be given where credit is due. Brett Favre is arguably one of the best quarterbacks of all time, and seemingly the toughest. His record for yards (71,838) and touchdowns (508) are hard to argue with, although he also holds the records for most times sacked and most...

Last One, I promise.....for this week. And it has controversy

I realize that this will be my third straight football post, but who can ignore the plethera of quality football on the college and professional level recently. I promise tomorow's post will not be football related. For now, though, I'd like to discuss college football. Althought the current bowl season has failed to impress to the level of years past (mainly the parody of this year's Fiesta Bowl ), last night's Sugar Bowl was exciting to say the least. The bowl featured two top ten teams, Ohio St. and Arkansas , as is expected given its BCS stature, and was action-packed from beginning to end, evident in the combined 57 points scored. Though it may seem as if this score was achieved by means of defensive failures, offensive struggles were the story of the night, as the Buckeyes won by a score of 31 to 26. NFL-bound quarterback Ryan Mallett threw for 277 yards and two touchdowns, stats, which although may appear impressive, do not rightfully reflect the NFL cali...

Equilibrium

A couple of weeks ago, I was watching an NFL pregame show, and in between the usual banter about RG III, Tim Tebow, and the Eagles (just three things in the NFL people need to shut up about), there was a comment that caught my attention. One of the announcers noted that the AFC had only two teams with a record above .500, the Ravens and Texans, who coincidentally would play later that day. So at first glance, as he noted, it appears the 'balance of power' has shifted to the NFC, in part due to NFC teams playing in larger markets (which is also a ridiculous statement).  Anyway, I'd like to fast forward two weeks and shit on this dude. As the standings sit today, both conferences have 7 teams with records above .500. So, clearly, fuck him. However, this announcer has two good excuses at this point. First, he made his comments during week 7, meaning most teams had played a total of 6 games, which despite being enough of a sample to judge the balance of power in the leag...